Lifestyle changes this year + future aging measurement regimen

To try to slow my own aging, I made three lifestyle changes in the last year:

  • Diet: I switched to primarily vegan, in addition to not eating breakfast until 10-11am most days. Along with many other studies, a 2022 meta study suggested a vegan diet is associated with ~8-13 years of longer life than an average western diet [1]. I figure a mostly vegan gets me 80-90% of that benefit. After making this change, my total cholesterol went from consistently high (~220 mg/dL) to consistently in the "healthy" range (~150 mg/dL).
  • Daily exercise: I try to get 60+ minutes of exercise as measured by Apple Watch every day. This includes brisk walking. I get there probably ~80% of the days. Previously, I was probably reaching that mark only ~50% of the days. Study after study shows exercise to have broad health benefits, though it's still unclear exactly what types of exercise, when and in what quantities is optimal.
  • Regular weight lifting: This year, I tried to lift weights at least once per week. I may increase this to twice per week. Many studies show weight lifting can preserve muscle strength, bone density and balance, which are all important for long-term health and safety. I know I'm not as strong as I was when I was in college and lifting weights and playing a lot of ultimate frisbee, but beyond that it's hard to know exactly how well I'm doing on muscle and bone health. 

I would guess these changes could extend my healthy lifespan by ~3-5 years, given I already had a healthier lifestyle than the average American.

Still, these are blunt instruments. I am in the dark about how my body is aging. What lifestyle changes or other interventions can extend my healthy lifespan by 10+ years? How are my different organs aging? Where am I losing resilience? What has caused my aging to speed up? To slow down? I would like a more robust, affordable aging measurement regimen. I don't have insight into real-time molecular and tissue changes going on inside my body. Most physiological measurements are lag indicators. For example, the commonly-used frailty index is the result of many systems degrading over time.

Here are three possibilities to greatly improve aging measurement:

  1. Near real-time omics measurements. Ideally, I'd have omics measurements taken multiple times a day to measure cellular and molecular dynamics. Today, it costs ~$500 to get a single microbiome omics assessment from Viome or a single DNA methylation age from Elysium. If you did these each 3 times a day for a whole year, it would run you over $1 million. How could we get this to something affordable for every American, e.g. $50/month, like the average cost of a cell phone bill?
  2. Frequent imaging. In the future, I'd like a regular full-body, high-resolution imaging of my body to detect aging and disease. Maybe daily or weekly, if we can make it easy? MRI technology can safely image your entire body at high-resolution. It can detect spatiotemporal dynamics and the onset of disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis via brain legions). Companies like Prenuvo and Q Bio are going down this path. Unfortunately, the cost is still high (~$2K/scan) and the process of driving to a facility is inconvenient.
  3. Longitudinal comparisons to millions of other people. Once you have all the data from #2 and #3, we need to know what the measurements imply for aging and health. To do this, we need longitudinal comparisons across millions of other people. Will  biobanks will move fast enough to collect this data? Will Apple Health with the Apple Watch will find ways to correlate its troves of real-time physiological to cellular and molecular dynamics?
I've made lifestyle changes this year that I hope pay off. But they are only a start, and I need better data to know what to do.


[1] Fadnes LT, Økland J-M, Haaland ØA, Johansson KA (2022) Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study. PLoS Med 19(2): e1003889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003889Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study.

Modeling our biology in detail

“Restoring order to the whole system is surely the eventual future of medicine. Unraveling the systems biology of aging is going to take incomprehensible amounts of data, enormous computing power, and smart computational biologists, working in tandem with those in the lab. Replacing numerical with narrative representation has revolutionized whole fields of science in the past, and the data and computation revolution in biology has only just begun. Once we can model our biology in detail, we’ll be able to reprogram it. Human beings will finally be negligibly senescent, biologically immortal, and ageless… It should be our collective mission.” - Andrew Steele, Ageless, 2020

One of the surprising things about aging science is how little we still know. We know far more than we did 40 years ago, thanks to a generation of pioneering investigators. But it seems that we have some puzzle pieces without the picture of how they fit together.

Another surprising thing is how little we know about our own bodies and health. We have high-level markers, such as blood panels, w physiological measures, etc. And we mostly rely on how we feel. If we feel good, we typically don't worry about our health. If we don't feel good, then something might be wrong. I generally feel great, young, energetic and healthy. Still, I know that damage from aging is accumulating throughout my 37 trillion cells and the tens of millions of biomolecules in each cell. Rust, damage and waste are taking root.

We don't yet know where this damage is happening. I can see the sun damage on my skin. I can feel my creaky ankles. But how is my heart aging? How is my brain aging? Where are little cancers forming? Which tissues are increasingly damaged that don't yet have noticeable dysfunction? It's hard to manage what you can't measure.

To Steele's quote, I believe it is critical to measure and model our biology. We need to know what's going on and intervene before it's too late. This will be a foundation for slowing and reversing aging. It's a massive challenge and will require new methods, data and computational techniques. It's where I expect to spend the next 20+ years of my career.

Risk of dementia declining in older Americans

Are we getting better at treating age-related disease? I wouldn't know how to answer this. It has been discouraging to see the average lifespan fall in the last few years in the United States.

Encouragingly, a recent study argues that the risk of dementia has significantly declined in Americans from 2000 to 2016 [1]. From the study: "The age-adjusted prevalence of dementia decreased from 12.2% in 2000 (95% CI, 11.7 to 12.7%) to 8.5% in 2016 (7.9 to 9.1%) in the 65+ population, a statistically significant decline of 3.7 percentage points or 30.1%."

It is not clear what is driving this decrease. Reason's most recent Fight Aging newsletter speculates authors speculate it may have to do with better maintenance of blood pressure and the use of statins [2]. Neurodegenerative diseases like dementia are critical for lifespan extension. If we don't have a healthy brain, is life worth living? This study suggests we are making progress.


[1] Hudomiet, Hurd and Rohwedder. Trends in inequalities in the prevalence of dementia in the United States. PNAS 2022, 119 (46) e2212205119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212205119  

[2] Reason. "The risk of suffering dementia is declining." Fight Aging. Accessed on Nov 19, 2022. URL: https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2022/11/the-risk-of-suffering-dementia-is-declining/